Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Valuation of imports from related suppliers and the inclusion or exclusion of royalty in the transaction value. The key points are: Rule 10(1)(c) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 allows for the addition of royalty to the transaction value of imported goods. The Supreme Court in CC vs. M/s Ferodo India Pvt Ltd examined the issue and held that technical know-how and royalty payment are includible in the price of imported goods if it is a prerequisite for the supply by the foreign supplier. However, in the present case, the pricing was at arm's length, and the relationship did not influence the price, which was accepted by the department in past transactions between the same parties. The Commissioner (Appeals) rightly held that there was no question of adding royalty to the transaction value. The CESTAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal, considering the Supreme Court's decision in CC vs. M/s Ferodo India Pvt Ltd.
Valuation of imports from related suppliers and the inclusion or exclusion of royalty in the transaction value. The key points are: Rule 10(1)(c) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 allows for the addition of royalty to the transaction value of imported goods. The Supreme Court in CC vs. M/s Ferodo India Pvt Ltd examined the issue and held that technical know-how and royalty payment are includible in the price of imported goods if it is a prerequisite for the supply by the foreign supplier. However, in the present case, the pricing was at arm's length, and the relationship did not influence the price, which was accepted by the department in past transactions between the same parties. The Commissioner (Appeals) rightly held that there was no question of adding royalty to the transaction value. The CESTAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal, considering the Supreme Court's decision in CC vs. M/s Ferodo India Pvt Ltd.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
