Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether royalty paid under the licence agreement was required to be added to the transaction value of imported goods under Rule 10(1)(c) of the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007.
Analysis: The decisive test was whether the royalty payment constituted a condition of sale of the imported goods and whether the relationship between the parties had influenced the declared import value. The record showed that the imports had consistently been accepted at arm's length in earlier transactions between the same parties, and the royalty was payable on net sales of finished goods under the licence arrangement. Applying the principle that royalty is includible only when it is a condition precedent for supply of imported goods, the Tribunal held that the department had not established the requisite nexus between the royalty and the imported goods.
Conclusion: Royalty was not liable to be added to the assessable value of the imported goods, and the Revenue's challenge failed.