Customs valuation royalty nexus: recurring royalty was includible, but lump sum royalty failed the condition-of-sale test.

Royalty is includible in customs assessable value only where it relates to the imported goods and is payable as a condition of sale. Applying Rule 9(1)(c) of the Customs Valuation Rules, the recurring royalty linked to net retail sales of finished products was held to have a direct nexus with the imported raw materials and was therefore includible in transaction value. The lump sum royalty was treated differently: the necessary condition-of-sale linkage with the imported goods was not shown with sufficient clarity, so it was not includible. The assessment was sustained only for the running royalty component.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether running royalty payable under the collaboration agreement was includible in the assessable value of the imported raw materials under Rule 9(1)(c) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988. (ii) Whether lump sum royalty payable under the same agreement was includible in the assessable value.

Issue (i): Whether running royalty payable under the collaboration agreement was includible in the assessable value of the imported raw materials under Rule 9(1)(c) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988.

Analysis: The agreement provided for technical information, technical assistance and a licence, and the royalty was computed with reference to net retail sales of the finished products, while the imported raw materials formed part of the production chain. Applying the principle laid down for Rule 9(1)(c), royalty is includible where it relates to the imported goods and is payable as a condition of sale. On the facts, the running royalty had a direct connection with the imported materials and was linked to the sale of the finished goods manufactured with those imports.

Conclusion: The running royalty was correctly held to be includible in the transaction value and is against the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether lump sum royalty payable under the same agreement was includible in the assessable value.

Analysis: The lump sum payment stood on a different footing from the running royalty. The nexus required under Rule 9(1)(c) was not established for this component in the same manner, and the reasoning accepted for the running royalty could not be extended automatically to the lump sum amount. The necessary condition-of-sale linkage with the imported goods was not shown with sufficient clarity for this component.

Conclusion: The lump sum royalty was not held includible and is in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The order sustained inclusion only of the running royalty in the assessable value, while excluding the lump sum royalty component.

Ratio Decidendi: Royalty is includible in the customs assessable value only when it is relatable to the imported goods and payable as a condition of sale, and a royalty computed on the sale price of the finished goods that embeds the value of imports satisfies that test for the recurring component alone on the facts found.

---