Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether royalty paid under the licence agreement was liable to be added to the transaction value of the imported goods under the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 despite acceptance of the declared price as the transaction value on the basis that the relationship between the importer and suppliers had not influenced the price.
Analysis: The declared import prices were found to match the supplier's price lists and the authorities had accepted the transaction value on the basis that the relationship between the parties had not influenced pricing. The royalty obligation under the licence agreement related to the manufacture of pantographs and not to a demonstrated condition of sale of the imported goods. Once the transaction value was accepted as arm's length and no nexus was shown between the royalty and the imported goods, Rule 10(1)(c) could not be invoked to load royalty into the assessable value.
Conclusion: The royalty was not includible in the assessable value of the imported goods and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.