Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Filters / Advanced Search ❯
TEXT

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws---- ❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ---- ❯
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ---- ❯
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
☰   Show Results ❯
    Actual receipt of goods governs input tax credit claims, requiring cumulative evidence and reasoned verification rather than invoice reliance alone.
    Curable GST pre-deposit defects require an opportunity to correct cash-ledger allocation before an amnesty appeal is rejected.
    Input tax credit claims require evidence beyond a supplier's later non-existence and unsupported fraud allegations.
    GST Transit Penalties Require Proof of Existing Contravention; Route Deviation and Uncorroborated Delivery Allegations Are Insufficient.
    Compensation Cess credit refunds require statutory inverted-tax-structure eligibility; admissible coal credit alone cannot support refunds on domestic...
    Road restoration charges for commercial pipeline work attract reverse-charge GST; portal-only proceedings remain valid without a physical DIN.
    Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
    Reassessment approval without examining loan evidence invalidates proceedings and requires fresh consideration of alleged undisclosed turnover.
    Transfer-pricing valuation requires associated-enterprise status and a prescribed method; research and software deductions depend on business nexus.
    Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
    Reassessment approval requires prescribed authority, and failure to issue mandatory scrutiny notice invalidates the resulting assessment proceedings.
    Section 68 evidence standards require deletion of share capital and loan additions when identity, creditworthiness and genuineness are established.
    Bad-debt write-offs and related-party rent: deductions sustained where receivables were written off and no market-value excess was shown.
    Presumptive taxation classification supports business treatment for global ranking support services over professional income estimation.
    Taxability of non-resident commissions governs TDS, while a missing residency certificate alone cannot create Indian tax liability.
    Genuineness of charitable activities requires transparent donation sources and identifiable public beneficiaries for registration renewal.
    Reasonable cause for cash property advances can avert penalties despite specified-sum restrictions and disclosure requirements.
    Political contribution genuineness governs deduction where accommodation-entry evidence defeats banking records and makes penalty challenge premature.
    Profit-element additions for non-genuine metal purchases apply where related sales are undisputed, reducing the purchase-based addition.
    Residual profit split method bars a second entity-level margin adjustment for the same integrated services transaction.
❮
❯
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Suit decreed partially for recovery, doctrine of lis pendens...

Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance, Applying Lis Pendens; Agreement Not Fraudulent or Collusive, Appeal Dismissed.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Indian Laws October 16, 2024 Case Laws SC
Suit decreed partially for recovery, doctrine of lis pendens applied. Agreement dated 17.08.1990 not found fraudulent or result of collusion between plaintiff and defendant no. 1. Trial court's finding on issue no. 5 not challenged by defendants through cross-appeal or objections. First Appellate Court erred in finding agreement collusive without cross-objections. Doctrine of lis pendens u/s 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 applies to alienation during pendency of suit, irrespective of notice to alienee. Sale deed executed on 08.01.1993 by defendant no. 1 in favor of defendant no. 2 during pendency of suit filed on 24.12.1992. Plaintiff non-suited on ground of defendant no. 2 being bona fide purchaser without notice, contrary to doctrine of lis pendens. High Court justified in setting aside Trial Court and First Appellate Court judgments, decreeing specific performance. Supreme Court affirmed High Court judgment, dismissed appeal.

Topics

Acts Income Tax