Appellate jurisdiction over baggage imports is excluded, requiring confiscation challenges involving passenger-carried gold to proceed by statutory re...
Article 227 review permits intervention in arbitration only for manifest, patent inherent jurisdictional defects, not representational authority dispu...
Tribunal examined allegations of fraudulent transactions u/s 66 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code against corporate debtor. Conversion of share application money to unsecured loan, conspicuous investments into related parties, and unaccounted rental income were scrutinized. Tribunal held fraud must be established beyond reasonable doubt, mere suspicion insufficient. Conversion of share money to debt not fraudulent. Investments in related parties explained, not prejudicial, complied with Companies Act. Cash withdrawals for salaries before 2016, not proximate to insolvency. Rental income agreements not proven fraudulent. Resolution Professional failed to establish fraudulent trading case u/s 66. Application dismissed due to lack of evidence of fraud.
Tribunal examined allegations of fraudulent transactions u/s 66 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code against corporate debtor. Conversion of share application money to unsecured loan, conspicuous investments into related parties, and unaccounted rental income were scrutinized. Tribunal held fraud must be established beyond reasonable doubt, mere suspicion insufficient. Conversion of share money to debt not fraudulent. Investments in related parties explained, not prejudicial, complied with Companies Act. Cash withdrawals for salaries before 2016, not proximate to insolvency. Rental income agreements not proven fraudulent. Resolution Professional failed to establish fraudulent trading case u/s 66. Application dismissed due to lack of evidence of fraud.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
