Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
The court held that the Committee of Creditors (CoC) rightly considered and rejected the resolution plan submitted by M/s. Saverni Neutech Pvt. Ltd. and approved the plan of M/s. Trinity India Forgetech Pvt. Ltd. with 92.87% vote share. M/s. Saverni Neutech Pvt. Ltd. had no occasion to pray for a revised resolution plan when it failed to file a plan within the stipulated time. The Adjudicating Authority did not err in rejecting the application filed by Sandeep Jayantilal Vadodria. Regarding Prem Trading Company's appeal, its authorized representative Rakesh Patel was present in the CoC meeting and rightly exited from voting on approving the resolution plan due to conflict of interest as a co-resolution applicant. Prem Trading Company's 2.48% vote share was insignificant, and the plan was approved by HDFC Bank Ltd., the largest creditor with 92.87% vote share. The appeals were dismissed as lacking merit.
The court held that the Committee of Creditors (CoC) rightly considered and rejected the resolution plan submitted by M/s. Saverni Neutech Pvt. Ltd. and approved the plan of M/s. Trinity India Forgetech Pvt. Ltd. with 92.87% vote share. M/s. Saverni Neutech Pvt. Ltd. had no occasion to pray for a revised resolution plan when it failed to file a plan within the stipulated time. The Adjudicating Authority did not err in rejecting the application filed by Sandeep Jayantilal Vadodria. Regarding Prem Trading Company's appeal, its authorized representative Rakesh Patel was present in the CoC meeting and rightly exited from voting on approving the resolution plan due to conflict of interest as a co-resolution applicant. Prem Trading Company's 2.48% vote share was insignificant, and the plan was approved by HDFC Bank Ltd., the largest creditor with 92.87% vote share. The appeals were dismissed as lacking merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
