<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds CoC&#039;s 92.87% Vote, Dismisses Appeals; Prem Trading&#039;s Abstention Deemed Insignificant in Resolution Plan.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81700</link>
    <description>The court held that the Committee of Creditors (CoC) rightly considered and rejected the resolution plan submitted by M/s. Saverni Neutech Pvt. Ltd. and approved the plan of M/s. Trinity India Forgetech Pvt. Ltd. with 92.87% vote share. M/s. Saverni Neutech Pvt. Ltd. had no occasion to pray for a revised resolution plan when it failed to file a plan within the stipulated time. The Adjudicating Authority did not err in rejecting the application filed by Sandeep Jayantilal Vadodria. Regarding Prem Trading Company&#039;s appeal, its authorized representative Rakesh Patel was present in the CoC meeting and rightly exited from voting on approving the resolution plan due to conflict of interest as a co-resolution applicant. Prem Trading Company&#039;s 2.48.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 08:15:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 08:15:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=770601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds CoC&#039;s 92.87% Vote, Dismisses Appeals; Prem Trading&#039;s Abstention Deemed Insignificant in Resolution Plan.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81700</link>
      <description>The court held that the Committee of Creditors (CoC) rightly considered and rejected the resolution plan submitted by M/s. Saverni Neutech Pvt. Ltd. and approved the plan of M/s. Trinity India Forgetech Pvt. Ltd. with 92.87% vote share. M/s. Saverni Neutech Pvt. Ltd. had no occasion to pray for a revised resolution plan when it failed to file a plan within the stipulated time. The Adjudicating Authority did not err in rejecting the application filed by Sandeep Jayantilal Vadodria. Regarding Prem Trading Company&#039;s appeal, its authorized representative Rakesh Patel was present in the CoC meeting and rightly exited from voting on approving the resolution plan due to conflict of interest as a co-resolution applicant. Prem Trading Company&#039;s 2.48.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 08:15:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>