Transfer-pricing aggregation of distinct support-service and subcontract transactions was rejected, while debt-free receivables attracted no notional ...
Customs exemptions cover photovoltaic assembly machinery and PVF backsheets, while fully declared cleared imports may avoid confiscation and penalties...
Specific tariff classification for LCD devices overrides treatment as electricity-meter parts, defeating differential duty, extended limitation, and p...
Stayed disciplinary punishment does not establish unfitness for insolvency professional registration; reconsideration must disregard mere pendency of ...
Indirect corporate control can create related-party status, excluding financial creditors from Committee of Creditors representation, participation an...
Scientific research association approval requires continuing SIRO status, annual donation reporting, and donor certificates for the approved foundatio...
Scientific research institution approval is conditional on SIRO recognition, annual donation reporting, donor certification, and prescribed compliance...
Page of 4878
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 97553 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The court held that the Committee of Creditors (CoC) rightly considered and rejected the resolution plan submitted by M/s. Saverni Neutech Pvt. Ltd. and approved the plan of M/s. Trinity India Forgetech Pvt. Ltd. with 92.87% vote share. M/s. Saverni Neutech Pvt. Ltd. had no occasion to pray for a revised resolution plan when it failed to file a plan within the stipulated time. The Adjudicating Authority did not err in rejecting the application filed by Sandeep Jayantilal Vadodria. Regarding Prem Trading Company's appeal, its authorized representative Rakesh Patel was present in the CoC meeting and rightly exited from voting on approving the resolution plan due to conflict of interest as a co-resolution applicant. Prem Trading Company's 2.48% vote share was insignificant, and the plan was approved by HDFC Bank Ltd., the largest creditor with 92.87% vote share. The appeals were dismissed as lacking merit.
The court held that the Committee of Creditors (CoC) rightly considered and rejected the resolution plan submitted by M/s. Saverni Neutech Pvt. Ltd. and approved the plan of M/s. Trinity India Forgetech Pvt. Ltd. with 92.87% vote share. M/s. Saverni Neutech Pvt. Ltd. had no occasion to pray for a revised resolution plan when it failed to file a plan within the stipulated time. The Adjudicating Authority did not err in rejecting the application filed by Sandeep Jayantilal Vadodria. Regarding Prem Trading Company's appeal, its authorized representative Rakesh Patel was present in the CoC meeting and rightly exited from voting on approving the resolution plan due to conflict of interest as a co-resolution applicant. Prem Trading Company's 2.48% vote share was insignificant, and the plan was approved by HDFC Bank Ltd., the largest creditor with 92.87% vote share. The appeals were dismissed as lacking merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4878 
