Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The assessee admitted certain income amounts under different heads like income from house property and income from other sources while filing the return. However, the amount was shown in the tax audit report as 'any other items of income' but not mentioned in the corresponding column of the return. The CPC made an addition under 'income from business or profession' based on this discrepancy. The ITAT held that since the assessee had already admitted and included these amounts under the respective heads, it was not necessary to mention them again under 'any other items of income'. Therefore, the addition made by the AO/CPC under 'income from business or profession' was not warranted and was set aside by the ITAT.
The assessee admitted certain income amounts under different heads like income from house property and income from other sources while filing the return. However, the amount was shown in the tax audit report as 'any other items of income' but not mentioned in the corresponding column of the return. The CPC made an addition under 'income from business or profession' based on this discrepancy. The ITAT held that since the assessee had already admitted and included these amounts under the respective heads, it was not necessary to mention them again under 'any other items of income'. Therefore, the addition made by the AO/CPC under 'income from business or profession' was not warranted and was set aside by the ITAT.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
