Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Contravention of Sections 8(3), 8(4), and 9(1)(b) of FERA established - illegal foreign exchange remittance abroad disguised as charges for imports that never occurred. Sections apply to 'person', not limited to 'importer'. Evidence showed appellant controlled firms receiving remittances despite claims of missing import documents. Customs reports confirmed no diamonds imported against remittances. Appellant orchestrated modus operandi for illegal remittances. Composite penalty upheld for contraventions by appellant and co-appellant. Appeals dismissed.
Contravention of Sections 8(3), 8(4), and 9(1)(b) of FERA established - illegal foreign exchange remittance abroad disguised as charges for imports that never occurred. Sections apply to 'person', not limited to 'importer'. Evidence showed appellant controlled firms receiving remittances despite claims of missing import documents. Customs reports confirmed no diamonds imported against remittances. Appellant orchestrated modus operandi for illegal remittances. Composite penalty upheld for contraventions by appellant and co-appellant. Appeals dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
