Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Contravention of Sections 8(3), 8(4), and 9(1)(b) of FERA established - illegal foreign exchange remittance abroad disguised as charges for imports that never occurred. Sections apply to 'person', not limited to 'importer'. Evidence showed appellant controlled firms receiving remittances despite claims of missing import documents. Customs reports confirmed no diamonds imported against remittances. Appellant orchestrated modus operandi for illegal remittances. Composite penalty upheld for contraventions by appellant and co-appellant. Appeals dismissed.
Contravention of Sections 8(3), 8(4), and 9(1)(b) of FERA established - illegal foreign exchange remittance abroad disguised as charges for imports that never occurred. Sections apply to 'person', not limited to 'importer'. Evidence showed appellant controlled firms receiving remittances despite claims of missing import documents. Customs reports confirmed no diamonds imported against remittances. Appellant orchestrated modus operandi for illegal remittances. Composite penalty upheld for contraventions by appellant and co-appellant. Appeals dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
