Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The Appellate Tribunal held that for determining the holding period of a property or calculating long-term capital gains, the date of allotment of the property is paramount. Subsequent acts like payment of installments, delivery of possession, and execution of sale deed originate from the allotment letter and are consequential. Therefore, the stamp duty value on the date of allotment should be considered u/s 56(2)(x) for assessing the difference between the stamp duty value and sale consideration. The difference between the stamp duty value as on 22.12.2014 (Rs. 1,88,00,000/-) and the sale consideration (Rs. 1,75,00,000/-) is to be assessed as income from other sources in the hands of the assessee, limited to their 1/3rd share (Rs. 13,00,000/-). Applying the principle of consistency, the assessee's case is allowed on the same grounds as their daughter's case decided earlier. The Assessing Officer is directed to modify the addition accordingly.
The Appellate Tribunal held that for determining the holding period of a property or calculating long-term capital gains, the date of allotment of the property is paramount. Subsequent acts like payment of installments, delivery of possession, and execution of sale deed originate from the allotment letter and are consequential. Therefore, the stamp duty value on the date of allotment should be considered u/s 56(2)(x) for assessing the difference between the stamp duty value and sale consideration. The difference between the stamp duty value as on 22.12.2014 (Rs. 1,88,00,000/-) and the sale consideration (Rs. 1,75,00,000/-) is to be assessed as income from other sources in the hands of the assessee, limited to their 1/3rd share (Rs. 13,00,000/-). Applying the principle of consistency, the assessee's case is allowed on the same grounds as their daughter's case decided earlier. The Assessing Officer is directed to modify the addition accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.