Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Insurance company computing income u/s 44 is not required to include profits from sale of investments for periods prior to 01.04.2011 as per Rule 5, aligning with decisions in United Insurance Company and Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Apollo Tyres Ltd. judgment on MAT computation is irrelevant as present case involves regular computation u/s 44 specific to insurance business. Profits from sale of investments must be included post 01.04.2011 due to amended Rule 5(b). High Court ruled in favor of assessee.
Insurance company computing income u/s 44 is not required to include profits from sale of investments for periods prior to 01.04.2011 as per Rule 5, aligning with decisions in United Insurance Company and Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Apollo Tyres Ltd. judgment on MAT computation is irrelevant as present case involves regular computation u/s 44 specific to insurance business. Profits from sale of investments must be included post 01.04.2011 due to amended Rule 5(b). High Court ruled in favor of assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.