Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Detention order quashed due to non-supply of crucial documents relied upon by detaining authority, violating detenu's right to make effective representation under Article 22(5). Statements of a key witness not provided, affecting detenu's defense. Non-receipt and inordinate delay in deciding detenu's representation by authorities also violated Article 22(5). Prison authorities' casual approach in transmitting representation deprecated. Authorities must ensure prompt transmission and expeditious decision on representations concerning personal liberty. Detention order unsustainable on these grounds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.