Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The Supreme Court held that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) failed to properly examine the material, evidence, and facts to determine if there was a valid transfer of shares or fraud committed u/ss 447 and 448 of the Companies Act, 2013. The exercise of power u/s 59 for rectification of the Register of Members requires thorough verification of assertions, evidence, and underlying facts, which was not done. The courts glossed over or ignored crucial documentary evidence and failed to conduct a detailed inquiry as mandated by law. The judgments of NCLT and NCLAT were set aside, and the appeal was allowed for a fresh examination of the matter.
The Supreme Court held that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) failed to properly examine the material, evidence, and facts to determine if there was a valid transfer of shares or fraud committed u/ss 447 and 448 of the Companies Act, 2013. The exercise of power u/s 59 for rectification of the Register of Members requires thorough verification of assertions, evidence, and underlying facts, which was not done. The courts glossed over or ignored crucial documentary evidence and failed to conduct a detailed inquiry as mandated by law. The judgments of NCLT and NCLAT were set aside, and the appeal was allowed for a fresh examination of the matter.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
