Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Cash deposits made during demonetization period from cash withdrawals and rental income received in cash were substantiated through cash flow statements and bank statements. The assessee, not required to maintain books of accounts, explained the cash deposits as accumulated over time from salary, rent, and interest income. Lower authorities rejected the cash flow statement demonstrating cash balance of Rs. 25,09,620 as on 8-11-2016, despite no dispute over the cash balance itself. The Tribunal found the assessee's submissions detailing the deposited amounts during demonetization period unambiguous, allowing the appeal.
Cash deposits made during demonetization period from cash withdrawals and rental income received in cash were substantiated through cash flow statements and bank statements. The assessee, not required to maintain books of accounts, explained the cash deposits as accumulated over time from salary, rent, and interest income. Lower authorities rejected the cash flow statement demonstrating cash balance of Rs. 25,09,620 as on 8-11-2016, despite no dispute over the cash balance itself. The Tribunal found the assessee's submissions detailing the deposited amounts during demonetization period unambiguous, allowing the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
