Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The court held that the tax liability arising from the deletion of additions under the remand order would be less than Rs. 1,00,00,000, rendering the appeal non-maintainable as per Circular No. 17/2019. Even if the appeal were allowed and remanded to the Tribunal, the subject matter would be Rs. 50,00,000, below the prescribed monetary limit. Considering the additions disallowed and the return, the tax liability would be less than Rs. 50,00,000, precluding the appeal before the Appellate Authority. Consequently, the court dismissed both appeals in accordance with Circular No. 17/2019, finding them undeserving of acceptance due to the low tax effect.
The court held that the tax liability arising from the deletion of additions under the remand order would be less than Rs. 1,00,00,000, rendering the appeal non-maintainable as per Circular No. 17/2019. Even if the appeal were allowed and remanded to the Tribunal, the subject matter would be Rs. 50,00,000, below the prescribed monetary limit. Considering the additions disallowed and the return, the tax liability would be less than Rs. 50,00,000, precluding the appeal before the Appellate Authority. Consequently, the court dismissed both appeals in accordance with Circular No. 17/2019, finding them undeserving of acceptance due to the low tax effect.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
