Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The High Court quashed the order of the Interim Board for Settlement (IBS) rejecting the petitioner's settlement application u/s 245D(4). The court held that the IBS should consider the application, keeping open all objections/contentions of the revenue, including on the applicable threshold limits under the first proviso to Section 245C(1). The court did not examine the petitioner's challenge to the constitutional validity of these provisions, and all contentions of the petitioner were expressly kept open. The writ petition was disposed of without costs.
The High Court quashed the order of the Interim Board for Settlement (IBS) rejecting the petitioner's settlement application u/s 245D(4). The court held that the IBS should consider the application, keeping open all objections/contentions of the revenue, including on the applicable threshold limits under the first proviso to Section 245C(1). The court did not examine the petitioner's challenge to the constitutional validity of these provisions, and all contentions of the petitioner were expressly kept open. The writ petition was disposed of without costs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.