Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not arise. Lower Authority's examination of unjust enrichment was superfluous when refund was held inadmissible. Unjust enrichment question arises only when refund is admissible on merits. No order under unjust enrichment can reject refund claim, only sanction refund and transfer amount to Consumer Welfare Fund. Appellant's claim lacks merit, appeal dismissed. CESTAT = Appellate Tribunal.
Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not arise. Lower Authority's examination of unjust enrichment was superfluous when refund was held inadmissible. Unjust enrichment question arises only when refund is admissible on merits. No order under unjust enrichment can reject refund claim, only sanction refund and transfer amount to Consumer Welfare Fund. Appellant's claim lacks merit, appeal dismissed. CESTAT = Appellate Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
