Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Corpus donations received by the trust for running Kalyana Mandapam were voluntary in nature and could not be treated as rental receipts. Although the activity generated surplus, the surplus was utilized for furthering other charitable purposes mentioned in the trust deed. The trust confined its activities within the boundaries set by the trust deed and did not drift from its objects. Therefore, the trust's claim for exemption u/s 11 could not be denied merely because the Kalyana Mandapam activity resulted in surplus funds. The Appellate Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to grant exemption u/s 11 and recompute the income for all years.
Corpus donations received by the trust for running Kalyana Mandapam were voluntary in nature and could not be treated as rental receipts. Although the activity generated surplus, the surplus was utilized for furthering other charitable purposes mentioned in the trust deed. The trust confined its activities within the boundaries set by the trust deed and did not drift from its objects. Therefore, the trust's claim for exemption u/s 11 could not be denied merely because the Kalyana Mandapam activity resulted in surplus funds. The Appellate Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to grant exemption u/s 11 and recompute the income for all years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.