Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Denial of exemption u/s 11 for assessment of a trust due to rejection of application for condonation of delay in filing Form 10B. The petitioner inadvertently delayed filing Form 10B due to the clerical staff of the Chartered Accountant suffering from a brain tumor. The High Court held that although the audit report was obtained on 07.05.2015, prior to the return filing date of 26.09.2015, the respondent adopted a pedantic approach in rejecting the condonation application. The reasons provided by the petitioner cannot be discarded as not constituting genuine hardship. The High Court quashed the impugned order, directing the respondent to condone the delay in filing Form 10B to enable the petitioner to obtain exemption u/s 11.
Denial of exemption u/s 11 for assessment of a trust due to rejection of application for condonation of delay in filing Form 10B. The petitioner inadvertently delayed filing Form 10B due to the clerical staff of the Chartered Accountant suffering from a brain tumor. The High Court held that although the audit report was obtained on 07.05.2015, prior to the return filing date of 26.09.2015, the respondent adopted a pedantic approach in rejecting the condonation application. The reasons provided by the petitioner cannot be discarded as not constituting genuine hardship. The High Court quashed the impugned order, directing the respondent to condone the delay in filing Form 10B to enable the petitioner to obtain exemption u/s 11.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
