Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Grant of bail involving wrongful availment of input tax credit by generating fake invoices causing wrongful gain to companies and wrongful loss to the Government. Court analyzed whether evidence available against petitioner regarding committing offense under CGST Act. Held that absence of material indicating accused petitioner as manager of firms not essential for prosecution u/s 132 of CGST Act. Provisions state whoever commits or causes to commit and retains benefits from supplies without invoice or without supplying goods avails input tax credit is liable. Court below erred in assessing consequence and spirit of Section 132. Incriminating material against petitioner ignored. While considering bail, gravity of offenses and misconstruing facts and legal position not considered. Cancellation of bail allowed, order granting bail set aside.
Grant of bail involving wrongful availment of input tax credit by generating fake invoices causing wrongful gain to companies and wrongful loss to the Government. Court analyzed whether evidence available against petitioner regarding committing offense under CGST Act. Held that absence of material indicating accused petitioner as manager of firms not essential for prosecution u/s 132 of CGST Act. Provisions state whoever commits or causes to commit and retains benefits from supplies without invoice or without supplying goods avails input tax credit is liable. Court below erred in assessing consequence and spirit of Section 132. Incriminating material against petitioner ignored. While considering bail, gravity of offenses and misconstruing facts and legal position not considered. Cancellation of bail allowed, order granting bail set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
