Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Grant of bail involving wrongful availment of input tax credit by generating fake invoices causing wrongful gain to companies and wrongful loss to the Government. Court analyzed whether evidence available against petitioner regarding committing offense under CGST Act. Held that absence of material indicating accused petitioner as manager of firms not essential for prosecution u/s 132 of CGST Act. Provisions state whoever commits or causes to commit and retains benefits from supplies without invoice or without supplying goods avails input tax credit is liable. Court below erred in assessing consequence and spirit of Section 132. Incriminating material against petitioner ignored. While considering bail, gravity of offenses and misconstruing facts and legal position not considered. Cancellation of bail allowed, order granting bail set aside.
Grant of bail involving wrongful availment of input tax credit by generating fake invoices causing wrongful gain to companies and wrongful loss to the Government. Court analyzed whether evidence available against petitioner regarding committing offense under CGST Act. Held that absence of material indicating accused petitioner as manager of firms not essential for prosecution u/s 132 of CGST Act. Provisions state whoever commits or causes to commit and retains benefits from supplies without invoice or without supplying goods avails input tax credit is liable. Court below erred in assessing consequence and spirit of Section 132. Incriminating material against petitioner ignored. While considering bail, gravity of offenses and misconstruing facts and legal position not considered. Cancellation of bail allowed, order granting bail set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
