Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Violation of Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, Special Economic Zones Rules, 2006, and Customs Act regarding smuggling into the NSEZ. Determination of whether a customs officer is a Proper Officer under the SEZ Act. Failure to establish contravention of Sections 111(m), 112(a), 112(b), and 114AA of Customs Act. Section 110 of Customs Act not a notified offence under SEZ Act. Lack of notification authorizing NSEZ officers to seize goods, rendering seizure and subsequent confiscation u/s 111(m) unsustainable. Vehicles used without knowledge of owner or person-in-charge, invalidating confiscation u/s 115(2). Confiscation of goods, seizure of vehicles, and penalty imposed on the Appellant set aside. Impugned orders quashed, appeal allowed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
