Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Faceless assessment notices issued by Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) held invalid due to non-compliance with Section 151A and notification dated 29 March 2022. The High Court concurred with its earlier decision in Hexaware Technologies Ltd., ruling that JAO lacked jurisdiction to issue such notices. Consequently, the impugned notices were declared illegal and invalid, and the petition was allowed in favor of the assessee.
Faceless assessment notices issued by Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) held invalid due to non-compliance with Section 151A and notification dated 29 March 2022. The High Court concurred with its earlier decision in Hexaware Technologies Ltd., ruling that JAO lacked jurisdiction to issue such notices. Consequently, the impugned notices were declared illegal and invalid, and the petition was allowed in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
