Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The High Court held that Section 249(4)(a) does not mandate payment of admitted tax before filing an appeal, contrary to the Revenue's contention. The ITAT merely interpreted Section 249(4)(a) regarding entertaining appeals where the amount is deposited before or after filing, without adjudicating merits. As the ITAT order was not erroneous and remanded the matter for adjudication on merits based on precedents, the High Court found no merit in the Revenue's appeal.
The High Court held that Section 249(4)(a) does not mandate payment of admitted tax before filing an appeal, contrary to the Revenue's contention. The ITAT merely interpreted Section 249(4)(a) regarding entertaining appeals where the amount is deposited before or after filing, without adjudicating merits. As the ITAT order was not erroneous and remanded the matter for adjudication on merits based on precedents, the High Court found no merit in the Revenue's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.