Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The assessee made cash deposits during the demonetization period which were treated as unexplained u/s 69A. However, the Tribunal held that the cash deposits were within the normal trends and practices of the business, with cash sales ranging from 87% to 92% of total sales in previous years. The cash deposited during the financial year 2016-17 was lower at 87.92% compared to earlier years, indicating no variance from the established pattern. As the assessee had sufficient cash balance per the accepted books of accounts, the cash deposits could not be treated as undisclosed income. The Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee.
The assessee made cash deposits during the demonetization period which were treated as unexplained u/s 69A. However, the Tribunal held that the cash deposits were within the normal trends and practices of the business, with cash sales ranging from 87% to 92% of total sales in previous years. The cash deposited during the financial year 2016-17 was lower at 87.92% compared to earlier years, indicating no variance from the established pattern. As the assessee had sufficient cash balance per the accepted books of accounts, the cash deposits could not be treated as undisclosed income. The Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
