Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Insolvency and BankruptcyAugust 20, 2024Case LawsAT
Corporate dispute involving allegations of oppression and mismanagement by equal shareholders. Key points: Oppression implies lack of probity or equity, intention behind actions relevant. No majority shareholder, issue of control over management. Appointment/removal of directors not oppression. Quasi-partnership principles applicable. Casting vote misused for personal benefit after dispute arose. Disqualifying both directors impermissible. Removing casting vote justified to prevent one group's control. Equal shareholders entitled to board representation based on shareholding.
Corporate dispute involving allegations of oppression and mismanagement by equal shareholders. Key points: Oppression implies lack of probity or equity, intention behind actions relevant. No majority shareholder, issue of control over management. Appointment/removal of directors not oppression. Quasi-partnership principles applicable. Casting vote misused for personal benefit after dispute arose. Disqualifying both directors impermissible. Removing casting vote justified to prevent one group's control. Equal shareholders entitled to board representation based on shareholding.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
