Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Substantial profits were generated by trading entities based on advance receipt of non-public information regarding stock recommendations from guest experts appearing on a business channel. Evidence shows correlation between trades executed by suspect entities and recommendations made by guest experts. Profit Makers collectively earned around INR 7.41 crore from 1047 instances of such trades, constituting 54% of their total profits during the relevant period. Guest experts admitted to having profit-sharing arrangements with Profit Makers for providing recommendations in advance. Trades were executed by Profit Makers in their accounts as well as accounts of other connected entities. The acts prima facie violate provisions of the SEBI Act prohibiting fraudulent and unfair trade practices by dealing in securities while possessing non-public information and devising schemes to defraud investors. A registered research analyst shared recommendations with her spouse before public dissemination, facilitating unfair trading, violating research analyst regulations. An interim ex-parte order is proposed to insulate markets, protect investors, prevent siphoning of unlawful gains, and issue show-cause notices for disgorgement, market debarment, and restraining registered analysts from advisory activities. Joint and several liabilities are proposed against relevant entities for the unlawful gains.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
