Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Vicarious liability for dishonoured company cheques may extend to non-signatory directors where complaints contain foundational responsibility avermen...
The case involves penalty imposition u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with statutory notices issued u/ss 143(2) and 142(1). Assessee explained non-compliance due to a hostile Director holding relevant information. The argument that subsequent compliance cannot be considered as assessment was u/s 144 was dismissed. Assessee's argument focused on substantial compliance post-penalty order. Penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) was deleted, and assessee's appeal allowed by the Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).
The case involves penalty imposition u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with statutory notices issued u/ss 143(2) and 142(1). Assessee explained non-compliance due to a hostile Director holding relevant information. The argument that subsequent compliance cannot be considered as assessment was u/s 144 was dismissed. Assessee's argument focused on substantial compliance post-penalty order. Penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) was deleted, and assessee's appeal allowed by the Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
