Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
TP Adjustment made by excluding two comparable companies due to excessive related party transactions, rendering them un-comparable. Other comparables to be considered for arm's length price computation. AO's jurisdiction over expenditure for support services upheld as consistent with TPO's acceptance over the years. Cost allocation methodology change disallowed. Depreciation allowance for intangible assets like customer contracts and workforce granted at 25% rate based on ITAT decision in the assessee's favor. Additional ground raised allowed.
TP Adjustment made by excluding two comparable companies due to excessive related party transactions, rendering them un-comparable. Other comparables to be considered for arm's length price computation. AO's jurisdiction over expenditure for support services upheld as consistent with TPO's acceptance over the years. Cost allocation methodology change disallowed. Depreciation allowance for intangible assets like customer contracts and workforce granted at 25% rate based on ITAT decision in the assessee's favor. Additional ground raised allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
