Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
TP Adjustment made by excluding two comparable companies due to excessive related party transactions, rendering them un-comparable. Other comparables to be considered for arm's length price computation. AO's jurisdiction over expenditure for support services upheld as consistent with TPO's acceptance over the years. Cost allocation methodology change disallowed. Depreciation allowance for intangible assets like customer contracts and workforce granted at 25% rate based on ITAT decision in the assessee's favor. Additional ground raised allowed.
TP Adjustment made by excluding two comparable companies due to excessive related party transactions, rendering them un-comparable. Other comparables to be considered for arm's length price computation. AO's jurisdiction over expenditure for support services upheld as consistent with TPO's acceptance over the years. Cost allocation methodology change disallowed. Depreciation allowance for intangible assets like customer contracts and workforce granted at 25% rate based on ITAT decision in the assessee's favor. Additional ground raised allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
