Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The CIT (Appeals) correctly invoked Section 45(4) to tax the increase in partners' capital accounts due to revaluation of firm assets, as this constitutes transfer of capital assets by the firm. The Supreme Court in Mansukh Dyeing case held revaluation and crediting partners' accounts is a transfer u/s 45(4). However, the CIT (Appeals) erred in considering the revalued amount as full value of consideration u/s 48. Fair market value on the transfer date should be considered, which the assessee proved as Rs. 7 lakh per acre based on Sub-Registrar's certificate. Capital gains are to be computed u/s 45(4) using this fair market value. The matter was decided partly in favor of the assessee.
The CIT (Appeals) correctly invoked Section 45(4) to tax the increase in partners' capital accounts due to revaluation of firm assets, as this constitutes transfer of capital assets by the firm. The Supreme Court in Mansukh Dyeing case held revaluation and crediting partners' accounts is a transfer u/s 45(4). However, the CIT (Appeals) erred in considering the revalued amount as full value of consideration u/s 48. Fair market value on the transfer date should be considered, which the assessee proved as Rs. 7 lakh per acre based on Sub-Registrar's certificate. Capital gains are to be computed u/s 45(4) using this fair market value. The matter was decided partly in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
