Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
When assessee allotted plot by Noida Authorities, entered agreement to sell on 07.02.2003 receiving Rs. 4,50,000/-, remaining Rs. 4,76,000/- paid to Noida Authorities as per schedule. Assessee paid remaining amount in 2007, Noida Authorities executed lease in buyer's favor. Buyer paid remaining amount to Noida Authorities who transferred lease. Since transaction between assessee and buyer concluded in 2003 as per prevailing circle rate, no addition u/s 50C warranted. Assessee's appeal allowed.
When assessee allotted plot by Noida Authorities, entered agreement to sell on 07.02.2003 receiving Rs. 4,50,000/-, remaining Rs. 4,76,000/- paid to Noida Authorities as per schedule. Assessee paid remaining amount in 2007, Noida Authorities executed lease in buyer's favor. Buyer paid remaining amount to Noida Authorities who transferred lease. Since transaction between assessee and buyer concluded in 2003 as per prevailing circle rate, no addition u/s 50C warranted. Assessee's appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
