Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Assessee failed to justify receipt discrepancy between ITR and Form 26AS, AO made addition considering it as fees for technical services and imposed penalty u/s 270A for under-reporting income. ITAT held penalty order silent on assessee's submissions, penalty notice lacked specific allegation of misrepresentation/suppression, and subsequent rectification of Form 26AS removed discrepancy. Relying on Supreme Court judgment, ITAT set aside penalty considering entirety of circumstances and allowed assessee's grounds.
Assessee failed to justify receipt discrepancy between ITR and Form 26AS, AO made addition considering it as fees for technical services and imposed penalty u/s 270A for under-reporting income. ITAT held penalty order silent on assessee's submissions, penalty notice lacked specific allegation of misrepresentation/suppression, and subsequent rectification of Form 26AS removed discrepancy. Relying on Supreme Court judgment, ITAT set aside penalty considering entirety of circumstances and allowed assessee's grounds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
