Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Insolvency and BankruptcyAugust 3, 2024Case LawsHC
The dispute arose between the parties regarding non-payment of rent. As per the agreement, the matter reached the Arbitrator, who allowed the petitioner/landlord's claim and directed recovery of a sum along with GST, interest, and other expenses. The petitioner claimed to have secured keys from security guards, while the respondent denied having any security guard. A criminal case was registered, and an application was filed on 17-10-2023. The vacation Court heard the matter and passed an order on 18-10-2023 after considering objections. The order stayed the Arbitrator's award, subject to the respondent furnishing a security deposit covering 5% of the award amount and granted a temporary injunction restraining the petitioner from disturbing the respondent's peaceful possession. The petitioner argued that the Court passed the order in a hurry, but the High Court dismissed the petition.
The dispute arose between the parties regarding non-payment of rent. As per the agreement, the matter reached the Arbitrator, who allowed the petitioner/landlord's claim and directed recovery of a sum along with GST, interest, and other expenses. The petitioner claimed to have secured keys from security guards, while the respondent denied having any security guard. A criminal case was registered, and an application was filed on 17-10-2023. The vacation Court heard the matter and passed an order on 18-10-2023 after considering objections. The order stayed the Arbitrator's award, subject to the respondent furnishing a security deposit covering 5% of the award amount and granted a temporary injunction restraining the petitioner from disturbing the respondent's peaceful possession. The petitioner argued that the Court passed the order in a hurry, but the High Court dismissed the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
