Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Invocation of extended period of limitation under proviso to section 73(1) of Finance Act, 1994 requires wilful suppression of facts with intent to evade service tax payment. Mere non-disclosure in returns cannot presume intent to evade. Department must prove positive act indicating suppression. If dispute involves interpretation of legal provisions, extended limitation cannot be invoked. Assessee's bona fide belief, even if incorrect, does not render it mala fide. No suppression of facts from department. Extended limitation wrongly invoked. Impugned order set aside. Appeal allowed.
Invocation of extended period of limitation under proviso to section 73(1) of Finance Act, 1994 requires wilful suppression of facts with intent to evade service tax payment. Mere non-disclosure in returns cannot presume intent to evade. Department must prove positive act indicating suppression. If dispute involves interpretation of legal provisions, extended limitation cannot be invoked. Assessee's bona fide belief, even if incorrect, does not render it mala fide. No suppression of facts from department. Extended limitation wrongly invoked. Impugned order set aside. Appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
