Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The appellant, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU), imported goods and stored them in a licensed warehouse u/s 58 of the Customs Act, 1962. These goods were destroyed in a fire accident at the factory premises. Although the goods were insured for their value, the duty element was not covered. The insurance company settled the claim after determining the fire was caused by unavoidable circumstances. The department also recorded the destroyed goods. Despite the duty element not being insured, there was no negligence on the appellant's part. As per Section 23 of the Customs Act, 1962, read with Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, and Notification No. 22/2023-CE dated 31.03.2003, when goods are lost, the question of demanding duty does not arise. The Appellate Tribunal, in a similar case, held that if the Assistant/Deputy Commissioner of Customs is satisfied that the imported goods have been lost, duty cannot be demanded. Since the fire occurred due to unforeseen reasons, the demand for duty is set aside, and the appeal is allowed.
The appellant, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU), imported goods and stored them in a licensed warehouse u/s 58 of the Customs Act, 1962. These goods were destroyed in a fire accident at the factory premises. Although the goods were insured for their value, the duty element was not covered. The insurance company settled the claim after determining the fire was caused by unavoidable circumstances. The department also recorded the destroyed goods. Despite the duty element not being insured, there was no negligence on the appellant's part. As per Section 23 of the Customs Act, 1962, read with Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, and Notification No. 22/2023-CE dated 31.03.2003, when goods are lost, the question of demanding duty does not arise. The Appellate Tribunal, in a similar case, held that if the Assistant/Deputy Commissioner of Customs is satisfied that the imported goods have been lost, duty cannot be demanded. Since the fire occurred due to unforeseen reasons, the demand for duty is set aside, and the appeal is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
