Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Mandatory requirements contemplated in Act for invoking proviso to Section 73(1) stated in show cause notice regarding petitioner's liability for service tax and penalties. After show cause notice under proviso, inquiry conducted, and opportunity given for reply, grounds urged by petitioner to be challenged through appeal under Act instead of challenging jurisdiction for issuance. Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 not entertainable when efficacious statutory appeal remedy available u/s 85. No cogent reasons shown for revenue not providing sufficient cause to invoke extended limitation period. Petition dismissed.
Mandatory requirements contemplated in Act for invoking proviso to Section 73(1) stated in show cause notice regarding petitioner's liability for service tax and penalties. After show cause notice under proviso, inquiry conducted, and opportunity given for reply, grounds urged by petitioner to be challenged through appeal under Act instead of challenging jurisdiction for issuance. Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 not entertainable when efficacious statutory appeal remedy available u/s 85. No cogent reasons shown for revenue not providing sufficient cause to invoke extended limitation period. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
