Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CENVAT credit was denied on ISD invoices for not containing prescribed particulars u/r 4A of Service Tax Rules, 1994. The appellant had availed credit by splitting service tax, education cess, and secondary higher education cess, which was held permissible as per Notification No. 10/2007-CE (NT). Regarding availment of credit on ISD invoices without receiving input services, it was held following Karnataka High Court's decision that the assessee is entitled to distribute CENVAT credit on input services to manufacturing or other units providing output services. The appellant was eligible for availing the credit, and the demand and penalty were set aside. The appeal was allowed.
CENVAT credit was denied on ISD invoices for not containing prescribed particulars u/r 4A of Service Tax Rules, 1994. The appellant had availed credit by splitting service tax, education cess, and secondary higher education cess, which was held permissible as per Notification No. 10/2007-CE (NT). Regarding availment of credit on ISD invoices without receiving input services, it was held following Karnataka High Court's decision that the assessee is entitled to distribute CENVAT credit on input services to manufacturing or other units providing output services. The appellant was eligible for availing the credit, and the demand and penalty were set aside. The appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
