Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Court ordered dissolution of company and discharged Official Liquidator as Liquidator u/s 481 of Companies Act, 1956 as Official Liquidator could not proceed further with winding up process. Relying on Supreme Court decision in Meghal Homes case, held that when affairs of company completely wound up or court finds Official Liquidator cannot proceed with winding up for want of funds or any other reason, court can dissolve company. Present case warranted ending liquidation proceedings, dissolving company in liquidation, and discharging Official Liquidator.
Court ordered dissolution of company and discharged Official Liquidator as Liquidator u/s 481 of Companies Act, 1956 as Official Liquidator could not proceed further with winding up process. Relying on Supreme Court decision in Meghal Homes case, held that when affairs of company completely wound up or court finds Official Liquidator cannot proceed with winding up for want of funds or any other reason, court can dissolve company. Present case warranted ending liquidation proceedings, dissolving company in liquidation, and discharging Official Liquidator.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.