Appellate jurisdiction over baggage imports is excluded, requiring confiscation challenges involving passenger-carried gold to proceed by statutory re...
Article 227 review permits intervention in arbitration only for manifest, patent inherent jurisdictional defects, not representational authority dispu...
AO exceeded jurisdiction by disallowing claim of brought forward unabsorbed depreciation through rectification u/s 154, as CIT(A) did not direct such disallowance. CIT(A) order attained finality on this issue. Post CIT(A) order, AO cannot rectify u/s 154 in absence of mistake apparent from record. CIT(A) order upheld, Revenue's appeal dismissed.
AO exceeded jurisdiction by disallowing claim of brought forward unabsorbed depreciation through rectification u/s 154, as CIT(A) did not direct such disallowance. CIT(A) order attained finality on this issue. Post CIT(A) order, AO cannot rectify u/s 154 in absence of mistake apparent from record. CIT(A) order upheld, Revenue's appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
