Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of AO exceeded jurisdiction by disallowing claim of brought forward unabsorbed depreciation through rectification u/s 154, as CIT(A) did not direct such disallowance. CIT(A) order attained finality on this issue. Post CIT(A) order, AO cannot rectify u/s 154 in absence of mistake apparent from record. CIT(A) order upheld, Revenue's appeal dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
