Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
The High Court held that the notices issued u/s 148 for reassessment on or after April 1, 2021, are barred by limitation u/ss 148 and 149 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court endorsed the views of the Supreme Court's decision in Ashish Agarwal's case and the Delhi High Court's decision in Suman Jeet Agarwal's case. The court ruled that the amended provisions of Section 148A, introduced by the Finance Act, 2021, would govern the field for any reassessment notice issued on or after April 1, 2021, as the unamended provisions were valid only until March 31, 2021. The court held that the impugned notices in these writ petitions were barred by limitation since they were dispatched from the Income Tax Department's portal on or after April 1, 2021.
The High Court held that the notices issued u/s 148 for reassessment on or after April 1, 2021, are barred by limitation u/ss 148 and 149 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court endorsed the views of the Supreme Court's decision in Ashish Agarwal's case and the Delhi High Court's decision in Suman Jeet Agarwal's case. The court ruled that the amended provisions of Section 148A, introduced by the Finance Act, 2021, would govern the field for any reassessment notice issued on or after April 1, 2021, as the unamended provisions were valid only until March 31, 2021. The court held that the impugned notices in these writ petitions were barred by limitation since they were dispatched from the Income Tax Department's portal on or after April 1, 2021.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.