Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether notices issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were barred by limitation when the departmental records showed despatch from the Income Tax Business Application portal on or after 01.04.2021, and whether mere preparation or digital signing of the notice on 31.03.2021 amounted to valid issuance within time.
Analysis: The decisive question was when a notice is "issued" for the purpose of sections 148 and 149. The Court examined the departmental electronic workflow and the statutory distinction between signing, generation, and despatch. It accepted the line of authority that issuance is complete only when the notice is sent out and goes beyond the control of the originating authority. Since the records showed that the impugned notices had left the portal only on or after 01.04.2021, mere preparation or dating of the notices as 31.03.2021 did not save them from the bar of limitation. The Court also endorsed the view that, in electronic dispatch, the relevant date is the date of actual despatch from the system, not the date shown on the notice.
Conclusion: The notices were held to be time-barred and unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The writ petitions succeeded because the impugned reassessment notices could not be treated as validly issued within the limitation period.
Ratio Decidendi: For reassessment notices under sections 148 and 149 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, issuance is complete only when the notice is actually despatched beyond the control of the issuing authority, and not when it is merely prepared, signed, or dated within limitation.