Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Notices issued u/s 148 by Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) were held invalid due to lack of jurisdiction, as per Section 151A and Central Government notification dated March 29, 2022. Relying on Hexaware Technologies Ltd. decision, High Court ruled that JAO lacked authority to issue impugned notices, rendering them illegal and invalid. Petition was allowed in favor of assessee.
Notices issued u/s 148 by Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) were held invalid due to lack of jurisdiction, as per Section 151A and Central Government notification dated March 29, 2022. Relying on Hexaware Technologies Ltd. decision, High Court ruled that JAO lacked authority to issue impugned notices, rendering them illegal and invalid. Petition was allowed in favor of assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.