Pre-amendment reassessment limitation bars late notices under the preserved regime, invalidating consequential reassessment for affected earlier asses...
Cash-sales explanations for bank deposits require documentary reconciliation; reassessment notice survived where effective response time was available...
Functional comparability in transfer pricing prevents ad hoc arm's length adjustments where functions, assets, risks and reliable comparables are unes...
Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
Page of 4920
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 98394 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Circular trading allegations of Cut and Polished Diamonds (CPD) and Gold Jewellery, over-invoicing exports of studded Gold Jewellery, misuse of Target Plus Scheme were raised. However, identical allegations were previously set aside by the Tribunal, affirmed by Supreme Court, holding no inter-relationship between parties, no circular trading. Joint DGFT order accepted no circular trading, exports valid for discharge of Advance License obligations. DGFT didn't cancel licenses or take action against respondents. Revenue's allegation of misdeclared exports/imports for fraudulent benefits not accepted. No grounds for duty demand, confiscation, or penalties found. Appeals by Revenue dismissed, upholding adjudicating authority's orders.
Circular trading allegations of Cut and Polished Diamonds (CPD) and Gold Jewellery, over-invoicing exports of studded Gold Jewellery, misuse of Target Plus Scheme were raised. However, identical allegations were previously set aside by the Tribunal, affirmed by Supreme Court, holding no inter-relationship between parties, no circular trading. Joint DGFT order accepted no circular trading, exports valid for discharge of Advance License obligations. DGFT didn't cancel licenses or take action against respondents. Revenue's allegation of misdeclared exports/imports for fraudulent benefits not accepted. No grounds for duty demand, confiscation, or penalties found. Appeals by Revenue dismissed, upholding adjudicating authority's orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.