<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cut &amp; polished diamonds, gold jewellery exports valid. No circular trading, license misuse found. Revenue&#039;s allegations dismissed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79494</link>
    <description>Circular trading allegations of Cut and Polished Diamonds (CPD) and Gold Jewellery, over-invoicing exports of studded Gold Jewellery, misuse of Target Plus Scheme were raised. However, identical allegations were previously set aside by the Tribunal, affirmed by Supreme Court, holding no inter-relationship between parties, no circular trading. Joint DGFT order accepted no circular trading, exports valid for discharge of Advance License obligations. DGFT didn&#039;t cancel licenses or take action against respondents. Revenue&#039;s allegation of misdeclared exports/imports for fraudulent benefits not accepted. No grounds for duty demand, confiscation, or penalties found. Appeals by Revenue dismissed, upholding adjudicating authority&#039;s orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 06:39:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 06:39:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cut &amp; polished diamonds, gold jewellery exports valid. No circular trading, license misuse found. Revenue&#039;s allegations dismissed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79494</link>
      <description>Circular trading allegations of Cut and Polished Diamonds (CPD) and Gold Jewellery, over-invoicing exports of studded Gold Jewellery, misuse of Target Plus Scheme were raised. However, identical allegations were previously set aside by the Tribunal, affirmed by Supreme Court, holding no inter-relationship between parties, no circular trading. Joint DGFT order accepted no circular trading, exports valid for discharge of Advance License obligations. DGFT didn&#039;t cancel licenses or take action against respondents. Revenue&#039;s allegation of misdeclared exports/imports for fraudulent benefits not accepted. No grounds for duty demand, confiscation, or penalties found. Appeals by Revenue dismissed, upholding adjudicating authority&#039;s orders.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 06:39:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>