Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Petitioner can bring gold chain with diamond pendant into India as personal effect under Baggage Rules 1998. Invoice for diamond purchase though unsigned, cannot be sole basis for rejection. Personal effect interpretation depends on context and person's background. For high net worth individual like Petitioner engaged in jewelry business with declared income of USD 150,000, expensive jewelry qualifies as personal effect. Customs authorities erred in initiating proceedings merely on high value ascription without considering Petitioner's background and valuation date discrepancy. Respondents directed to refund Rs. 35,00,000 deposited by Petitioner within four weeks.
Petitioner can bring gold chain with diamond pendant into India as personal effect under Baggage Rules 1998. Invoice for diamond purchase though unsigned, cannot be sole basis for rejection. Personal effect interpretation depends on context and person's background. For high net worth individual like Petitioner engaged in jewelry business with declared income of USD 150,000, expensive jewelry qualifies as personal effect. Customs authorities erred in initiating proceedings merely on high value ascription without considering Petitioner's background and valuation date discrepancy. Respondents directed to refund Rs. 35,00,000 deposited by Petitioner within four weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.