Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Section 33 of IBC bars institution of new suits during liquidation process, but allows continuation of pending suits/proceedings, unlike Section 14 which prohibits both. Respondent unlawfully adjusted ITR amount against pre-CIRP tax dues without filing claim before Liquidator, despite public announcement. ITR amount was part of liquidation estate, and adjustment violated rights of other stakeholders. Matter remanded to examine quantum of set-off allowed against Respondent's claim entitlement in liquidation proceedings.
Section 33 of IBC bars institution of new suits during liquidation process, but allows continuation of pending suits/proceedings, unlike Section 14 which prohibits both. Respondent unlawfully adjusted ITR amount against pre-CIRP tax dues without filing claim before Liquidator, despite public announcement. ITR amount was part of liquidation estate, and adjustment violated rights of other stakeholders. Matter remanded to examine quantum of set-off allowed against Respondent's claim entitlement in liquidation proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
